<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Statistical Look At The Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/09/a-statistical-look-at-the-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/09/a-statistical-look-at-the-defense/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 09:21:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Good Ol Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Link Me Please! The 9/24/09 Edition.</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/09/a-statistical-look-at-the-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-29213</link>
		<dc:creator>The Good Ol Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Link Me Please! The 9/24/09 Edition.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=4889#comment-29213</guid>
		<description>[...] And now for a trip around the ACC neighboordhod &#8230; Think Maryland and Virginia fans can buy each other drinks Oct. 17? (Turtle Waxing) &#8230; a league match-up that I haven&#8217;t seen mentioned once on our message boards this week is Wake Forest-Boston College but Blogger So Dear and Eagle in Atlanta have Q&amp;A posts up &#8230; Tar Heel fan is talking defense. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And now for a trip around the ACC neighboordhod &#8230; Think Maryland and Virginia fans can buy each other drinks Oct. 17? (Turtle Waxing) &#8230; a league match-up that I haven&#8217;t seen mentioned once on our message boards this week is Wake Forest-Boston College but Blogger So Dear and Eagle in Atlanta have Q&amp;A posts up &#8230; Tar Heel fan is talking defense. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeanForever</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/09/a-statistical-look-at-the-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-29189</link>
		<dc:creator>DeanForever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=4889#comment-29189</guid>
		<description>Interesting header.
Go Heels!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting header.<br />
Go Heels!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heeledsoul</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/09/a-statistical-look-at-the-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-29188</link>
		<dc:creator>heeledsoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=4889#comment-29188</guid>
		<description>nice banner THF! although, i&#039;m surprised to see tate over nicks...

i was actually checking the stats too this am while smack talking with my bumblee bee bro-in-law.

http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2009&amp;div=IA&amp;site=org

i also saw these two interesting stats:

#7 first down allowed (11.33/game)
#63 turnover margin (0.0 net/game)

along with the high 3rd down conversion ranking, the high first down allowed ranking re-emphasizes the effectiveness of our defense.

also, the low turnover ranking highlights UNC&#039;s different defensive strategy this year from the last. last year, we were highly ranked in this category and our just-rush-4 strategy relied on our DBs intercepting the ball. and we all complained about the big yardage we gave up using this strategy. i believe our defense is significantly more fundamentally sound because it is so dominant without relying on winning the turnover margin.

yes, so our opponents haven&#039;t been great so far like an alabama or another acc top team. but uconn beat down a baylor team, which beat wake, so... our schedule isn&#039;t all that bad. at least not nc state bad.

btw, why not give our other punter a chance? the son of the &quot;great&quot; jeff feagles?

also, my bro-in-law insists that if dwyer doesn&#039;t play, GT&#039;s offense won&#039;t be affected much since it&#039;s primarily the (chop)blocking that lets their rushing game go. i disagree but i actually am more worried about the big play ability of nesbitt to d.thomas combo. any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice banner THF! although, i&#8217;m surprised to see tate over nicks&#8230;</p>
<p>i was actually checking the stats too this am while smack talking with my bumblee bee bro-in-law.</p>
<p><a href="http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2009&#038;div=IA&#038;site=org" rel="nofollow">http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2009&#038;div=IA&#038;site=org</a></p>
<p>i also saw these two interesting stats:</p>
<p>#7 first down allowed (11.33/game)<br />
#63 turnover margin (0.0 net/game)</p>
<p>along with the high 3rd down conversion ranking, the high first down allowed ranking re-emphasizes the effectiveness of our defense.</p>
<p>also, the low turnover ranking highlights UNC&#8217;s different defensive strategy this year from the last. last year, we were highly ranked in this category and our just-rush-4 strategy relied on our DBs intercepting the ball. and we all complained about the big yardage we gave up using this strategy. i believe our defense is significantly more fundamentally sound because it is so dominant without relying on winning the turnover margin.</p>
<p>yes, so our opponents haven&#8217;t been great so far like an alabama or another acc top team. but uconn beat down a baylor team, which beat wake, so&#8230; our schedule isn&#8217;t all that bad. at least not nc state bad.</p>
<p>btw, why not give our other punter a chance? the son of the &#8220;great&#8221; jeff feagles?</p>
<p>also, my bro-in-law insists that if dwyer doesn&#8217;t play, GT&#8217;s offense won&#8217;t be affected much since it&#8217;s primarily the (chop)blocking that lets their rushing game go. i disagree but i actually am more worried about the big play ability of nesbitt to d.thomas combo. any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasFan11</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/09/a-statistical-look-at-the-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-29187</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasFan11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=4889#comment-29187</guid>
		<description>Totally loving the new header. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally loving the new header. <img src='http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smallandpettypat</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/09/a-statistical-look-at-the-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-29186</link>
		<dc:creator>smallandpettypat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=4889#comment-29186</guid>
		<description>I dig the new header.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dig the new header.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heels Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/09/a-statistical-look-at-the-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-29185</link>
		<dc:creator>Heels Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=4889#comment-29185</guid>
		<description>LOVE the banner.  Butch is smiling from his perch......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOVE the banner.  Butch is smiling from his perch&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heels Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/09/a-statistical-look-at-the-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-29184</link>
		<dc:creator>Heels Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=4889#comment-29184</guid>
		<description>How many years ago was it, when the Heels were 119 out of 119?

I really have no real expectations of winning championships, but wow, watching UNC play football these days is certainly easier to stomach than a few years ago.

^Agree with the above, I&#039;m sure Barth and Shallock are kicking right now..........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many years ago was it, when the Heels were 119 out of 119?</p>
<p>I really have no real expectations of winning championships, but wow, watching UNC play football these days is certainly easier to stomach than a few years ago.</p>
<p>^Agree with the above, I&#8217;m sure Barth and Shallock are kicking right now&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

