<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ginyard Practices, Strickland Does Not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:56:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeelYeah</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32753</link>
		<dc:creator>HeelYeah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32753</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say most high schoolers are more polished offensively than defensively.  I don&#039;t think most of these guys put tremendous effort into defensive development early on, and that&#039;s not what the fans go to see.  They wait for guys like Roy to pound it into their young heads I guess :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say most high schoolers are more polished offensively than defensively.  I don&#8217;t think most of these guys put tremendous effort into defensive development early on, and that&#8217;s not what the fans go to see.  They wait for guys like Roy to pound it into their young heads I guess <img src='http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32750</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32750</guid>
		<description>Actually I should say that offensively he&#039;s special, with an uncommon knowledge of the game and unselfishness to go along with skills. He also goes hard on the boards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I should say that offensively he&#8217;s special, with an uncommon knowledge of the game and unselfishness to go along with skills. He also goes hard on the boards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32749</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32749</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m watching the game on dvr right now HS, and I have same impression. his offense is very good, but his defense on the ball is not impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m watching the game on dvr right now HS, and I have same impression. his offense is very good, but his defense on the ball is not impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heeledsoul</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32748</link>
		<dc:creator>heeledsoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32748</guid>
		<description>Harrison Barnes is a great player. Very polished offensive player whose penetration skills are highlighted by his awareness, quickness, length and strength. Once he gets his first step on the first defender, it&#039;s too late. Plus he finds his teammates very well. Loves the skip pass to find a more open shooter. He looks like he needs to have a more consistent jump shot and a more accurate long range shot. At 6-6, he feels very comfortable dribbling and handling the ball. He let&#039;s the game come to him, takes his time and attacks when he finds an opening. 

Barnes had 26 pts 13 rebs and a bunch of steals. His hands are quick and his reach is long, genetrating numerous turnovers by disrupting passes. But when he was guarding someone face to face, he had a tough time and let a few go right past him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harrison Barnes is a great player. Very polished offensive player whose penetration skills are highlighted by his awareness, quickness, length and strength. Once he gets his first step on the first defender, it&#8217;s too late. Plus he finds his teammates very well. Loves the skip pass to find a more open shooter. He looks like he needs to have a more consistent jump shot and a more accurate long range shot. At 6-6, he feels very comfortable dribbling and handling the ball. He let&#8217;s the game come to him, takes his time and attacks when he finds an opening. </p>
<p>Barnes had 26 pts 13 rebs and a bunch of steals. His hands are quick and his reach is long, genetrating numerous turnovers by disrupting passes. But when he was guarding someone face to face, he had a tough time and let a few go right past him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32727</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32727</guid>
		<description>&quot;They’ve got some talent down low. &quot;

That they do.  Pittman is definitely a load (if you can call someone who has lost 100 pounds a load), and James is as good a rebounder at 6&#039;6 as you will find.  However, UT has very limited depth behind those two, so is the get in foul trouble the Horns cold be in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They’ve got some talent down low. &#8221;</p>
<p>That they do.  Pittman is definitely a load (if you can call someone who has lost 100 pounds a load), and James is as good a rebounder at 6&#8217;6 as you will find.  However, UT has very limited depth behind those two, so is the get in foul trouble the Horns cold be in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heeledsoul</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32723</link>
		<dc:creator>heeledsoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32723</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;m worried about both perimeter and the interior. They&#039;ve got some talent down low. 

Btw, the newest Tar Heel Harrison Barnes will be showcased on THU night at 9 on ESPN. I&#039;ve never seen him play so I&#039;m looking forward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;m worried about both perimeter and the interior. They&#8217;ve got some talent down low. </p>
<p>Btw, the newest Tar Heel Harrison Barnes will be showcased on THU night at 9 on ESPN. I&#8217;ve never seen him play so I&#8217;m looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uncgirl50</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32722</link>
		<dc:creator>uncgirl50</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32722</guid>
		<description>You know what they say, history repeats itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what they say, history repeats itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZACCFan</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32721</link>
		<dc:creator>AZACCFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32721</guid>
		<description>So is Ginyard&#039;s foot issue really a bruise?

That would be great, as he can certainly get over it.

UNC has played basketball pretty well in football stadiums of late as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is Ginyard&#8217;s foot issue really a bruise?</p>
<p>That would be great, as he can certainly get over it.</p>
<p>UNC has played basketball pretty well in football stadiums of late as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russfuss</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32720</link>
		<dc:creator>russfuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32720</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ginyard Practices, Strickland Does Not.&quot;  Thanks, THF, for the timely update.  Half good news is better than no news when it comes to Carolina.

&quot;Since Texas is a guard heavy team with plenty of depth, it would be prudent to have all perimeter players available.&quot;-THF

When is in not prudent to have all perimeter players available?  Or any other players. Why not just say, &quot;I wish we had...&quot;, which is really meant, and forget the literature.

&quot;That being said, it is a December game UNC probably should not have scheduled, something Roy has admitted.&quot;-THF

How come it should not have been scheduled?  Did Roy give a reason?  It&#039;s a home-and-home arrangement made a year or maybe more ago, yes?  (Not that I condone inviting Bluto Barnes into the Dean E. Smith Center.  Unconscionable.)  If the reason for lamenting the scheduling is because we may lose, as I suspect is some&#039;s reason for the lament, then that ain&#039;t so much &quot;reasoning&quot; as it is a lack of confidence or, perhaps, a reading of the wall.  So what if this young, developing bunch lose to a highly proficient, more experienced team?  Carolina&#039;s history is chock full of losses to teams that were lesser. Championship game with Marquette in &#039;77(?) comes to mind. Those REALLY burn!  What&#039;s the biggie with losing to a better team?  

Not that I believe we necessarily will, by the way. That vaunted Texass depth is now depleted by (maybe) 2 guards, who were the last two starters. Now if only they could see some depletion on the interior...that&#039;s where they are strong (literally) and Heels are weak (so far).

It&#039;s all about the D, folks. Time for that &quot;Defensive Identity&quot; to show its fierce face; time for Opening Night, for real.  Intense, consistent ball pressure, trapping press, humiliating blocks - that&#039;s what I want to see. For two halves.  WIN OR LOSE.  To me, that&#039;s the substantive profit to be made with this match-up.

Zoomba, Heels!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ginyard Practices, Strickland Does Not.&#8221;  Thanks, THF, for the timely update.  Half good news is better than no news when it comes to Carolina.</p>
<p>&#8220;Since Texas is a guard heavy team with plenty of depth, it would be prudent to have all perimeter players available.&#8221;-THF</p>
<p>When is in not prudent to have all perimeter players available?  Or any other players. Why not just say, &#8220;I wish we had&#8230;&#8221;, which is really meant, and forget the literature.</p>
<p>&#8220;That being said, it is a December game UNC probably should not have scheduled, something Roy has admitted.&#8221;-THF</p>
<p>How come it should not have been scheduled?  Did Roy give a reason?  It&#8217;s a home-and-home arrangement made a year or maybe more ago, yes?  (Not that I condone inviting Bluto Barnes into the Dean E. Smith Center.  Unconscionable.)  If the reason for lamenting the scheduling is because we may lose, as I suspect is some&#8217;s reason for the lament, then that ain&#8217;t so much &#8220;reasoning&#8221; as it is a lack of confidence or, perhaps, a reading of the wall.  So what if this young, developing bunch lose to a highly proficient, more experienced team?  Carolina&#8217;s history is chock full of losses to teams that were lesser. Championship game with Marquette in &#8217;77(?) comes to mind. Those REALLY burn!  What&#8217;s the biggie with losing to a better team?  </p>
<p>Not that I believe we necessarily will, by the way. That vaunted Texass depth is now depleted by (maybe) 2 guards, who were the last two starters. Now if only they could see some depletion on the interior&#8230;that&#8217;s where they are strong (literally) and Heels are weak (so far).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about the D, folks. Time for that &#8220;Defensive Identity&#8221; to show its fierce face; time for Opening Night, for real.  Intense, consistent ball pressure, trapping press, humiliating blocks &#8211; that&#8217;s what I want to see. For two halves.  WIN OR LOSE.  To me, that&#8217;s the substantive profit to be made with this match-up.</p>
<p>Zoomba, Heels!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBowling</title>
		<link>http://www.tarheelblog.com/2009/12/ginyard-practices-strickland-does-not/comment-page-1/#comment-32719</link>
		<dc:creator>JBowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/?p=5614#comment-32719</guid>
		<description>Oh man. Just as Strickland was starting to get into his groove, we lose him (a position we need more than any other too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man. Just as Strickland was starting to get into his groove, we lose him (a position we need more than any other too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

