We have spent over 24 hours parsing Roy Williams’ postgame comments after UNC defeated Rutgers as well as the player performances in that game. Roy’s displeasure with the team was expressed in full today with two practices on the day between games which sounds pretty rough until I heard that Kentucky had seven practices in the three days after Christmas. In that respect, Roy is not pushing the colts too hard. However it is clear after the game against Rutgers that the Heels are doing plenty wrong.
It is well known Roy is a perfectionist and demands perfection in every aspect of the game. Now, he is fully aware he is not going to get it but that is the standard. You can imagine a game full of mistakes like UNC committed against Rutgers stand a good chance of driving him up the wall. For Roy it is all about making smart plays and executing on both ends of the floor. Simply being great on offense is not good enough, you better play defense too. From where Roy sits the ends can never justify the means. Why? Because playing smart gives you the best chance to succeed versus depending solely on talent.
For the life of me I could not figure out why Roy was so upset over Dexter Strickland’s made three then it dawned on me. Roy expects his players to execute the best play, the smart play. The result, especially in a game like this, matters less to Roy than the Heels executing properly. The primary reason behind that thinking is the reality of basketball versus the caliber of teams UNC will face in the ACC. Strickland’s talent trumped the coaching in this instance because Strickland’s talent exceeded that of his opponent though the gap is thinner than one my think. In upcoming games UNC fill face similar to even superior talent levels not unlike what they have already seen in the ranked opponents. When the talent level is virtually equal the coaching then matters much more. The difference between an ACC win or loss could come down to UNC being the team the executes better or plays smarter. Yes, there will be moments where a risky shot, like Strickland pays off. Talent is not without its merits and sometimes you get the talented play even if it is not the smart play. For now though, Roy is looking to get his players on the same page when it comes to doing what he expected them to do. Executing on the fundamental level which leads to fewer turnovers and theoretically higher percentage shots is the best formula for winning. It is never wise to come up short in those areas then believe you can be better in terms of talent to simply get by.
Of course we could also debate the merits of Roy openly chastising players before the media. Certainly he could have been more circumspect in his remarks as not to crush any one player’s confidence. Then again this is Roy we are talking about who never spared the allegedly fragile egos on the 2005 team and likely will not here. It has long been his style to talk about his players in a very raw and honest way which at times comes off harsh. It is done partly for motivation and partly because Roy doesn’t care for fluffing things in front of the media. Not to mention the fact that reporters ask about specific players and plays. Roy obliges them with some very straightforward assessments. If you catch him on a night in which he is really pissed about the Heels’ play, those comments go supernova awfully quick. Fortunately it appears the players understand and agree with the assessments despite the tone and method of delivery.
Overall I think Roy’s goal is to get this team meshed as a unit and executing on both ends properly. I also think for some reason the curve is a little steeper than it was in 2006. Roy often spoke of the 2006 team as being willing to learn and fairly smart when it came to doing whatever he told them to do. This squad seems a little more stubborn in this regard so breaking them in fully might take a little longer. Which is to say even though UNC is struggling at times now it does not mean it will continue. It only means Roy is going to push them as hard as regulations permit to eliminate the shortcomings and produce a solid unit of players.
Given the track record alone I cannot imagine it not coming together not to mention betting against Roy is so abjectly stupid it should never be entertained seriously.
![[Bloglines]](http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/bloglines.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[MySpace]](http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[Technorati]](http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Windows Live]](http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/windowslive.png)
![[Yahoo!]](http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/yahoo.png)
![[Email]](http://www.tarheelblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
To be honest, Roy’s displeasure with Strick’s shot echos the mantra that Dean also lived by: play the odds. How many times did we see a Dean Smith coached team lose because the opponent shot lights out from the perimeter and we let them keep taking the long range jumper? But how many more times did we see the Heels win because they let the opponent shoot the low percentage shot because that is all they could get against our defense? Strickland’s shot was a relatively low percentage shot given the particular circumstances, which is why it was a bad shot in Roy’s book. It is no secret that the closer you are to the basket, the better your chances are of scoring. That is why Roy always wants the play to be “inside then outside”. He understands (as did Dean) that outside shots are OK, but only when the easier (and better %) shot is not available. You will not win 100% of your games this way, but you might win 70%+ this way. That has always been an acceptable number to Dean and Roy, and to me as well.
Heel Yeah,
You are correct about Roy wanting the the higher percentage shot, but I think Roy was more mad and this is brought out in Coach Robinson’s comments that the shot was taken too early… Only six seconds had run off the shot clock…This is a close game, up four with 1:59 left, you run some clock, get into an offense set and work for the high percentage or get fouled, Carolina was in the double bonus at the time… But, you never, never, in a late game situation, when the clock is on YOUR side, shoot six seconds into the shot clock… That’s what made Roy the maddest, I think…
Good points from THF, Yeah and Chuck.
The 2006 season was certainly the most enjoyable of the Roy era. No expectations. However in retrospect we had no idea Number 50 was going to be one of the greatest of all time. I think he was a shock to the Heels’ opponents. Don’t forget that the Heels had two other NBA caliber players on the court with Number 50. AS I remember, Roy only played 7-8 guys regularly.
This year, Heels fans have more expectations. It is apparent this team doesn’t have good chemistry (is Roy playing too many guys?) yet. A lot of fans put lots of expectation on Ginyard but he has been inconsistent, partly due to injury issues. Another surprise actually is that John Henson simply isn’t ready physically to play against the big boys. However, I have been pleased with Drew, Strickland, Zeller, Davis and the Wears. Thompson and Graves need to play at a higher level IMO.
And in defense of these guys, the 2009 team had their own issues knowing when to burn the clock such as against MD last season. It is something that happens from time to time.
chuckheel85:
I agree. I read Roy’s new book yesterday and in a section he discussed the collapse against dook a few years ago where no play was made on the last play of the game. He said that the few possessions before that play, the Heels took some ill-advised shots too quickly into the shot clock which allowed dook enough time to take the lead and then the rest is history. He mentioned that if they had just taken a shot clock violation the last 4 possessions of the game, they would have won.
^ Yep I read that as well and Roy said that mistake taught Raymond a few things and it eventually paid off against Illinois.
THF remembers the rush down the court by Lawson against Maryland when all of Tar Heel nation was screaming at him to stop. Too bad he couldn’t hear us through the TV!