Comments on: #9 UNC vs Virginia Tech

By: magic rat 83

magic rat 83 — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:41:33 +0000

We have very limited ability to create in the half court. When our transition offense doesn’t produce, we are stuck.

By: william

william — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:23:14 +0000

That is a true shame if UNC only has one player (Ginyard) who can allegedly guard the other team’s best player. If that is true, then I think that Roy is not all he is cracked up to be as a recruiter….

By: magic rat 83

magic rat 83 — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:18:08 +0000

Zeller having a Deon vs Texas like night.

By: AZACCFan

AZACCFan — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:57:28 +0000

Sure.

Veteran teams are better at comebacks. But this team is due. So let’s see how it plays out!

By: C. Michael

C. Michael — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:19:14 +0000

“But this game must turn significantly on positive player emotion and consistent effort, I think.”

Agreed, but I actually think that a big reason why UNC has not lost 2 in a row in so long is that “positive player emotion and consistent effort” have generally been ratcheted up following a loss.

By: AZACCFan

AZACCFan — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:49:57 +0000

Those are comforting stats C. Michael. But this game must turn significantly on positive player emotion and consistent effort, I think.

By: C. Michael

C. Michael — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:42:13 +0000

With Delaney questionable (but will play), at UNC, where the Heels are undefeated, and given that UNC hasn’t lost 2 straight in almost 3 years, I’d give the points.

By: AZACCFan

AZACCFan — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:41:25 +0000

I don’t care for LV or anything associated with it. Tiger or not.

By: russfuss

russfuss — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:26:34 +0000

Vegas has VT +8.
Just asking – any would-be takers here?

My own reaction is, Geez, these bookies don’t make it easy, do they.

By: AZACCFan

AZACCFan — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:05:32 +0000

^If they are going anywhere this year, fired up for sure!