Login

 

August 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Stats

  • Total Stats
    • 4 Authors
    • 4,176 Posts
    • 101 Tags
    • 89,550 Comments
    • 1,413 Comment Posters
    • 47 Links
    • 161 Post Categories
    • 7 Link Categories
PageRank Checking Icon

From The Frying Pan To The Fire

At this point I know better than to ask if this could get any worse because I know full well it could if it comes out this tutor did something for a basketball player or two.

Just in case you were wondering, vacation was good. Many thanks and much appreciation to Doc for covering this story so thoroughly. The story caught me completely off guard and I spent most of dinner casting furtive glances at my Blackberry hoping Tar Heel Wife would not notice and confiscate the device from me. I stated on Twitter it is very strange to get the story in short blurbs from multiple sources all at once. Doc has done an excellent job of recapping everything that has happened over the past three days. Unlike the agent investigation, UNC decided to turn the lights on and flood the PR zone. With the agent issue, UNC was perfectly willing to cede the PR ground in hopes the situation would be resolve quickly while only affecting a couple of players. The story with Agent-gate is one or two players making a poor decision in regards to the regulations on gifts from former teammates. The hope was that it would be neatly wrapped in time for the start of the season with minimal to no damage for the football program.

This situation is entirely different. The academic reputation of the school is on the line. With that being the case, the “base” as Joe Ovies points out, needs to be placated. UNC has every reason to control the conversation in the PR realm by talking to the local media as much as possible. It would not surprise me to see Dick Baddour and Steve Kirschner talking to media almost daily to either give updates or issue clarifications for stories that might be floating out there. Letting speculation run wild is not going to work with this story thought there is no way UNC can control all the speculation that floats across the internet.

Still, as much as UNC has talked there are many questions left unanswered. The foremost in the eyes of most UNC fans is what to make of Dick Baddour’s statement that they are not ruling anything out, including possible spillover into other sports? And by “what to make” I mean “will basketball be affected?!?!?” That has to be the primary concern in Chapel Hill right now and to be honest it sent a chill down my spine when Baddour said everything was in play.  Not to play the “it’s only football” card but I imagine this investigation into academic issues is being conducted with basketball on the left front burner and football on the right. And if they burn the rice on the right to make sure the chicken is properly cooked on the left, that’s what is going to happen.

Also among the questions swirling around has to be the Nixonian one. What did UNC know and when did they know it? According to Baddour, UNC caught mention of this tutor’s name in an interview. The context in the interview was non-academic in nature so UNC decided to look into the issue deeper. The question is when was this? During the interviews in early August? The subsequent later interviews? Via transcripts even after that? There is no way of knowing but it is a safe bet UNC started their probe into academic issues before it came to light via Inside Carolina.  That means there is the possibility UNC only went public on Thursday because the story was about to break on Inside Carolina. Does that make them wrong? Depends on your point of view. The longer you keep something quiet the easier it is to investigate. Then again the longer you investigate the harder it is to keep it quiet. There is one caveat: It is doubtful Butch Davis would jeopardize preparing his defense for an upcoming game by leaving the starters on the first team for the sake of appearance. That sudden change would seem to indicate UNC did indeed find out on Thursday or more likely the investigation reached a point where they had sufficient actionable information to create eligibility questions. As a side note to this, does the mention of the tutor(or former tutor) in a non-academic sense mean it is possible this individual wrote papers for these players after he employment relationship with UNC ended? Remember the timetable is the tutor worked for the academic support program before Davis arrived then worked for Davis personally after he took the UNC job. It is unclear when the alleged violations occurred or when the tutor stopped working at UNC which is the key evidence.

Finally, the biggest question of all is who is this tutor? Based on information coming from Baddour, the woman in question worked for the academic support program prior to Butch Davis’ arrival at UNC. Later she went to work for Davis assisting his son Drew with his academics. Now it turns out she may have written papers for football players making this whole business very strange in a Lifetime Movie of the Week sort of way.  Now, I have no idea who this woman is or what her motives may have been for the actions she has allegedly taken in her role as a tutor for UNC football players. She may have been well intentioned and monumentally stupid all at the same time. If the players took her help in this way that are deserve whatever penalties are coming to them. All that being said, it is very weird to have a tutor who allegedly wrote papers for football players to then end up being a tutor for Butch Davis’ son. I am not saying she is a stalker but it does have that quality to it in some respects. Added note: Someone has pointed out to me that it is also possible the players took advantage of the tutor putting the responsibility on the players alone.

At the end of the day, I am not sure anyone at UNC much cares about the motives. Baddour and Thorp want to know what happened, who is guilty so they discipline as needed. For UNC, a “win” in all of this is two-fold. First, they need to show they have properly dealt with the issue with appropriate disciplinary actions that satisfies not so much the public’s need for blood but rather the Carolina Way constituency. The other side of it is winning the PR battle. For UNC to win that they basically have to look tough on the offenders even if it means a setback in football for this season. More importantly the story has to be that Austin and Little acted without knowledge of the coaches and this was a lone rogue tutor not widespread corruption in the academic support program. If that is truly the story(i.e. the NCAA concludes as much) and UNC can effectively sell it with the NCAA handing down at most one vacated season and a handful of suspensions then Butch Davis survives. Remember, Davis apparently enjoys the support of key academic leaders at UNC which means a implosion of the football program a la NCSU destroying the basketball program in 1989 seems less likely. If that is the case football program survives though the recruiting would take a hit for a period of time. If this ends up being the corrupt actions of a few outside the control of those in authority UNC looks more like a victim. It also becomes a cautionary tale for other programs. If UNC can have a pair of players make mistakes likes this or one tutor aid players in committing academic infractions then it is very much a “this could happen to anyone” situation not intentional malfeasance on the part of Butch Davis, Dick Baddour or anyone else running the programs in Chapel Hill.

However if the NCAA proves whole John Blake-Gary Wichard connection means  Blake knew agent contact/gifts were happening and it goes beyond one tutor then heads will roll starting with Davis and possible engulfing Baddour as well. Not to sound all pessimistic but UNC athletics is staring down a potentially nasty end of a fairly big gun. If the facts of the case show one thing, it will do untold damage. If it is indeed localized to one tutor, just football players and some poor decisions by the parties involved that is probably the best we can all hope for at this point. Take the penalties, let the chips fall where they may and for the love of the Old Well move on.

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

14 comments to From The Frying Pan To The Fire

  • Nice post, my thoughts on the scope of the tutor issue as well, maybe the general population as well. It could also be much worse than someone trying to curry favor, imagine if the tutor was paid for the papers. I would think that when a player mentions a tutor no longer in the official program that would be enough to raise eyebrows. I keep hoping for the glass to be full not empty. I would think the ability to review the work, turned in by the players and get the interviews done with the professors and instructors would be something that could happen quickly. Get it done, drop the hammer, drop it hard, move forward.

  • Heel To The End

    i’m going to try and hold on to my scenario that every single player mentioned in any way with the tutor, even an email from player X to player Y that they are using this tutor and “hey, you should try her if you need any help”, is being put on hold, as it were.
    what do you do if you are investigating this kind of cheating? you have to look at all the assignments, all the papers, all the tests, and talk to all the professors or TAs, and the players, and hopefully the tutor.
    you have to compare the work. the style, the content. this probably goes back a year, right? so that takes time.
    like THF said, theyll look at the other sports that she may have come into contact with.
    if she came up in interview or email with 12 football players, maybe 9 used her. maybe 0, 1, 2 or 9 passed off her work as their own.
    you couldnt possibly know the exact number without an out and out confession from the player(s) or an accusation from the tutor, that you then have to confirm.
    its possible, POSSIBLE, that on the tutor problem alone, that only 1 or 2 of the 12 guys have any real Honor Court issue.
    thats what i’m hoping for.

    also, i understand you can appeal in the Honor Court, and that process can take months.
    i still wonder what can happen to the tutor, if anything. writing a paper for a student isnt a legal matter, right? what if everything is inconclusive and the tutor doesnt cooperate? trying to think, but her denying everything would bring…what?
    the administration is going to have to present a solid, thoroughly investigated report, or we’ll never hear the end of it.

  • rathskellar68

    I respectfully disagree that the academic reputation of the school is on the line. This appears to be isolated to the sports team(s). There is no reason to believe plagairism is generally practiced at Carolina.

    The only way our academic reputation is jeopardized is if plagairism is discovered and not sternly penalized.

    HTTE — You are correct, writing a paper for a student is not a crime. From what I know, the tutor has no legal jeopardy. Still, she might not want to talk; it’s an unpleasant situation to say the least, and she most likely would want to distance herself from it.

    Her cooperation would be extremely helpful but not necessarily essential for the University’s investigation. My guess is that most players who turned in her work as their own will admit it. It can also be proven by extrinsic evidence, such as comparing a known writing sample from a player to the work they handed in. If the handed-in paper has a markedly different vocabulary, syntax, puncuation and style, and if known samples are chock full of incorrect spellings but the handed in paper has none, right there you have a pretty good idea of what the story is.

    These are dark days for us. The only thing worse than a losing performance is a dirty performance. We might be plagued with both.

  • 52bgJ

    whoever they put on the field against LSU, Coach Davis needs to have these guys on their best behavior. Don’t know enough about the Tigers MO, but it wouldn’t surprise me a bit to see a few “egging-on” situations, that the Heels need to be above, in a Nationally televised game with the spotlight already on them for all the wrong reasons.
    There is an officials meeting at this very moment determining the outcome of a nasty HS fight this past Friday night that could have been avoided had the Principals acted more responsibly and been proactive instead of reactive. There’s been enough “out-of-control” lately that we don’t need another event to underscore that.

  • Heel To The End

    ^^
    “It can also be proven by extrinsic evidence, such as comparing a known writing sample from a player to the work they handed in. If the handed-in paper has a markedly different vocabulary, syntax, punctuation and style, and if known samples are chock full of incorrect spellings but the handed in paper has none, right there you have a pretty good idea of what the story is.”

    so you could ask where is the oversight from the professor or TA that read the papers, or that noticed a marked improvement. unless, of course, it lasted an entire class. ick.

  • rathskellar68

    “ick” is an apt summary of the whole thing.

  • 850inExile aka UNC RAJ

    If the tutor was also a student at the time that this happened, couldn’t the University take her degree away? After all, she broke the honor code too.

  • Heel To The End

    i’m not sure there’s even been any reports that she got her degree at UNC. or even what her age is.

  • Charleston HEEL

    Why would a tutor’s name come up in an agent investigation? If she no longer works for the university, could she be working for an agent?

  • 52bgJ

    “Why would a tutor’s name come up in an agent investigation? If she no longer works for the university, could she be working for an agent?”

    my guess (from 10,00 feet), is that this indiscretion has been festering for some time, and that someone (likely Faculty) decided now was the time to bring it out into the open.

  • Heel To The End

    if the account on this site is correct, i dont think faculty was interviewed about the agent situation.
    the mention of her name wouldve come up from a player? or friend of a player?
    nonacademic context. hm.
    did she…go on a trip with one of them? did a player use her as an alibi regarding his whereabouts, as in NOT at a party in Miami?

  • 52bgJ

    I didn’t say anything about an interview.

  • No. She was known to the players and possibly friendly with them outside of the tutor context. If this was after her employment with UNC and I think it was her name being dropped in a non-academic context caused UNC to investigate if there was anything going on there. It also indicates there might be something up with the reason she was let go from academic support.